On Friday 15th November 2019, Senate House was
host to ‘Conan Doyle and London,’ a symposium organised by the Institute of
English Studies at the School of Advanced Study, University of London, in
association with the forthcoming Edinburgh Edition of the Works of Conan Doyle.
And if you’re looking for a quick summation of the conference, here it is: it’s
a great time to be a Doylean.
The conference took as its focus Conan Doyle and his
relationship with the metropolis throughout his life and work. It brought together
well-respected speakers from the worlds of genre-fiction, spiritualism, and Sherlockian
scholarship with an audience that was almost as august, including established
and emerging academics, BSI members and representatives of the Doyle estate.
The audience assemble at Senate House, London |
The day began with a welcome from conference organiser Douglas
Kerr, followed by his paper on ‘Conan Doyle: Man of Letters, Man about Town.’ Kerr
tracked Doyle’s shifting relationship with London, from the manly sanctuary of
clubbable London to the ‘redemptive and feminine’ suburbs, bringing in works
like the little-remembered Beyond the City (1891). Indeed, Kerr’s talk
set up the critical importance of 1891 in Conan Doyle’s career, a period we
returned to frequently during the conference, and which was addressed in our
first podcast on The Doings of Raffles Haw. Kerr set up the theme of Conan
Doyle as both ‘a Scotsman on the make’ who saw writing as a profession and a writer
who lived out the duties he felt were incumbent on a ‘proper’ Victorian man of
letters.
It was then over to Jonathan Cranfield who spoke on Conan Doyle’s
relationship with print culture (‘Of Time and the City: Conan Doyle and London Print
Culture’). Cranfield argued that Conan Doyle was a product of the ‘Doyleaspora,’
a third-generation immigrant who benefitted from the hard work of earlier generations
but carried inherited baggage. This in part influenced Conan Doyle’s view of the
relative value of certain periodicals, a hierarchy with the religious tract
society’s boys own papers at the bottom. Cranfield discussed Conan Doyle’s relationships
with editors (we touch on his relationship with Leslie Stephen of Cornhill in
our second podcast which covers The Winning Shot), his controversies with Hall
Caine and William Robertson Nicoll, and the ‘alignment of the stars’ that was
his association with The Strand Magazine.
Jonathan Cranfield |
Andrew Glazzard took us firmly into Sherlockian territory
with a paper on the canon’s diplomatic stories (The Naval Treaty, The
Second Stain and The Bruce-Partington Plans) and their role in the
evolution of espionage and invasion fiction ('"A great traffic was going on, as usual, in Whitehall": Public Places and Secret Spaces in Sherlock Holmes's London'). Glazzard showed how Doyle’s stories
used real world places and partially disguised locations (and characters) to comment on foreign policy and other contemporary issues, such as the depiction of bureaucracy
in The Naval Treaty reflecting the rising importance of administration
in public life and concerns about state security with the passing of the first Official
Secrets Act in 1889. Glazzard demonstrated how Conan Doyle laid the foundations
for later writers, inspiring many include William Le Queux whose Spies of
the Kaiser (1909) is a direct lift of The Bruce-Partington Plans.
The Underground map that informed The Bruce Partington Plans |
Catherine Cooke, familiar to many for her work with the
Sherlock Holmes Society of London and the Marylebone Library collection, spoke
on the various attempts to identify the true 221B Baker Street ('I have my eye on a suite in Baker Street.'). In addition to
reviewing the main candidates, Cooke drew on census data and other sources to talk
about neighbours with whom Holmes and Watson would have been familiar: the
tobacconist, pharmacist and local publicans. Perhaps most interesting of all
was Cooke’s detective work to track the cab journey the 14 year old Conan Doyle
took with his aunt to the house of the London Doyle’s, suggesting he had
indeed been familiar with Baker Street, both on this journey and his subsequent
visit to Mme Tussauds in the Baker Street Bazaar.
Illustration from The Case of Lady Sannox |
The final paper was given by Christine Ferguson on ‘Metropolitan
Spiritualism and Doyle's The Land of Mist.’ Ferguson discussed the imagined
geography of the spiritualists, the attempts to co-locate this geography with
the real world and the effect achieved (or not) in The Land of Mist (1926),
Conan Doyle’s most significant proselytising work of fiction. On the way,
Ferguson addressed Challenger’s easy conversion, Conan Doyle’s lack of interest
in Enid’s journey and the problems faced by the wonderful illustrator F. E. Hiley
in the story’s serialisation in The Strand Magazine. Noting the post-war
real-world settings and problematic ending, Ferguson argued that, far from being
an Imperial romance, the novel is an anti-romance.
An illustration by Hiley for The Land of Mist |
The day was concluded by Douglas Kerr and Kate Simpson who
revealed more about the Edinburgh Edition of the Works of Arthur Conan Doyle, a
22-volume collected works. The series is being produced in two tranches, with
Kerr as editor for the eleven pre-1900 volumes. They include Memories and
Adventures (1924), edited by Kerr, which will be one of the first two volumes
issued (we hope) next year. While not pre-1900, it is fitting that this
importance piece of self-mythologising, which has not been tackled in any
significant way for some time, is an early fixture of the new collected works. Many
of the editors were present and day was peppered with thoughts that will no
doubt make their way into their introductions and annotations. Kate Simpson
took us through the Edinburgh Works website, launched only hours before, which
can be accessed at www.edinburgh-conan-doyle.org
and you can follow its evolution on Twitter as @doyleedinburgh.
Douglas Kerr introduces the first 11 volumes of the Edinburgh Edition |
So that brought to an end what was a very interesting and
worthwhile conference. I was delighted with the breadth of topics and the way
the speakers placed Conan Doyle within the wider history of literature as one of its great innovators. The
quality of papers was universally excellent, with plenty of thought-provoking
questions from the audience, and much interested discussion on the fringes of a proposed new Arthur Conan Doyle Society. Thank you to everyone involved –
speakers, audience members and organisers (special mention to Eleanor Hardy who
administered the event). You may rest assured that the symposium achieved precisely
what is needed, and indeed what we hope to do, in our small way, with this podcast: to promote knowledge, appreciation and
study of Conan Doyle’s life and works.
And if all that’s not enough to whet your appetite, there’s
more to come with ‘Conan Doyle in Edinburgh’ taking place on 25-27th June 2020 in the Scottish capital. I, for one, will be there.
Mark
It was great to meet you at the conference Mark. Thanks for coming, and thanks for this excellent report on proceedings. (Please note, though, that the second speaker was Jonathan Cranfield, not Cauldfield. Jonathan is the author of TWENTIETH CENTURY VICTORIAN: ARTHUR CONAN DOYLE AND THE STRAND MAGAZINE, 1891–1930.) The conference was a great success, in large measure thanks to the questions and comments of a lively and knowledgeable audience! We look forward to seeing you all again for CONAN DOYLE IN EDINBURGH in June. All best, Douglas
ReplyDeleteThank you, Douglas. And apologies to Jonathan CRANFIELD. I have corrected this error in the updated report. Roll on June 2020!
DeleteI've just come across a very good review of the event by attendee Simon Guerrier: http://0tralala.blogspot.com/2019/11/conan-doyle-and-london.html
ReplyDelete